|
A key element of the product definition is the setting of clear
limits on the design freedoms of the designer. Those involved in
product definition will understand the dangers of both over definition
and under definition. It is all too easy to specify a requirement
in such a way as to assume a particular implementation. On the other
hand it is all too easy to specify a requirement so generally that
the designer needs to commit to large scale research activities
to identify and choose a development path.
Over Definition
The problem of over definition occurs when the product requirements
are based on a key technology or a specific method of implementation
rather than a market requirement. All requirements need to be tested
for motive. The key motives will include market based requirements
but also a number of business or business mission related requirements.
For example, it may be appropriate to specify a particular aspect
of a product in order to make use of surplus stocks, a manufacturing
technology or competence.
To test each specified requirement for motive is probably the most
effective method of testing the validity of a product definition's
contents. A motive that is unsupported by market requirement, business
requirement or other bona fide requirement should be reviewed to
determine whether the requirement is impinging on design freedom.
Over definition is difficult to avoid and designers working from
a product definition should be encouraged to question any perceived
occurrence of that nature. The evolution of new techniques, processes
or ways of thinking can change the perception of a product definition
over time.
|